Ease of doing business should not become ease of destroying the environment. Examine (150 Words)
“Ease of doing business should not become ease of destroying the environment.” Examine (150 Words)
Introduction
India’s push for rapid economic growth and global competitiveness has made Ease
of Doing Business (EoDB) a key policy priority. However, when regulatory
simplification turns into regulatory dilution, environmental protection becomes
collateral damage. The statement underlines the ethical and constitutional need
to balance development with ecological sustainability.
Why the
Concern is Valid
- Dilution of Environmental
Safeguards
Post-facto environmental clearances, relaxed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) norms, and project approvals without adequate site details weaken preventive regulation. - Judicial Leniency
Courts have increasingly allowed mitigation over strict compliance, as seen in infrastructure and mining approvals, reducing the deterrent value of environmental law. - Ecological Fragility
Projects such as the Char Dham highway, mangrove clearances in coastal cities, and mining in the Aravallis threaten fragile ecosystems, leading to floods, landslides, water stress, and biodiversity loss. - Corporate Influence and
Procedural Inequality
Large corporations navigate regulatory barriers easily, while local communities face restricted participation, raising concerns of Article 14 (equality) and Article 21 (right to a healthy environment).
Why
Environmental Protection is Non-Negotiable
- The Constitution under Article
48A mandates the State to protect the environment.
- Article 51A(g) imposes a duty on citizens to
safeguard natural resources.
- Sustainable development and
the precautionary principle are integral to Indian environmental
jurisprudence.
Way
Forward
- Shift from fast-track
approvals to credible impact assessments.
- Strengthen independent
regulators and judicial green benches.
- Ensure transparency, public
consultation, and ecological accounting.
Conclusion
True ease of doing business lies not in weakening safeguards but in creating a
development model that respects ecological limits. Growth that destroys the
environment ultimately destroys itself.
Comments
Post a Comment