“constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike…..” In View of the above observation of the Supreme Court, explain the concept of constitutional morality and its application to ensure balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability in India. Introduction
“constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike…..” In View of the above observation of the Supreme Court, explain the concept of constitutional morality and its application to ensure balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability in India.
Introduction
The Supreme Court has observed that constitutional
morality is the guiding principle to ensure that constitutional values
override arbitrary use of power. It is not mere adherence to constitutional
provisions, but respect for its spirit—justice, liberty, equality, and
fraternity. In the judicial context, it provides a framework to balance independence
of the judiciary with the need for accountability in a democracy.
Concept of Constitutional Morality
- Coined
by B.R. Ambedkar: "It means adherence to the core principles and
values of the Constitution beyond the literal text."
- Emphasizes
rule of law, checks on authority, and protection of individual rights.
- Prevents
degeneration of democracy into majoritarianism or arbitrariness.
Judicial Independence and Accountability: The
Dilemma
- Judicial
Independence: Essential for impartial justice;
insulated from executive/legislative pressures (Article 50, security of
tenure, salaries).
- Judicial
Accountability: Judiciary must be answerable for
misconduct, corruption, or the arbitrary exercise of powers, as it wields
public trust.
- Tension
arises: Absolute independence may lead to an unaccountable judiciary;
excessive accountability may erode independence.
Application of Constitutional Morality
- Collegium
vs NJAC (2015): SC struck down NJAC, citing a threat to
independence, but emphasised transparency in collegium functioning.
- Impeachment
Provisions (Art. 124(4)): Ensures accountability
while respecting independence.
- Contempt
of Court Power: Must be exercised with restraint;
constitutional morality demands balancing the dignity of the court with
freedom of speech.
- Judicial
Review: Courts review executive/legislative
excesses, but constitutional morality requires self-restraint to avoid
judicial overreach.
- Code
of Conduct & RTI Act (2019): SC ruling brought the CJI
office under RTI, reflecting accountability in line with constitutional
values.
Conclusion
Constitutional morality acts as a moral compass
ensuring that judiciary neither becomes an unaccountable oligarchy nor
succumbs to external pressure. A careful balance—through institutional
transparency, judicial restraint, and adherence to constitutional values—ensures
that independence and accountability coexist in harmony, strengthening India’s
democratic fabric.
Comments
Post a Comment